The four stages of passage planning and making still apply when navigating with electronic equipment: Appraise, Plan, Execute, Monitor. In almost every way, once you have mastered your onboard system and identified your go-to sources, passage planning can become infinitely quicker by letting the electronics do the heavy lifting.
There are new skills to learn, new equipment to master and new sources of information to explore, but the human gathering the information will still need to link pieces of the puzzle into decisions and a plan. The information in publications such as the Reeds Nautical Almanac or pilotage guides will still be relevant, but in future it may be presented in a digital format, or within electronic charts.
In this lies not only great benefit but also hidden dangers. Many manufacturers have their own operating system, terminology, user interface and even chart formats. We’ll need to develop skills to identify systems and sources that we trust or simply prefer.
Screen size will be a limiting factor. A mobile phone charting app may be useful for bigger picture overviews of an area, but the limited screen size increases the risk of missing detail. It’s also predominantly deriving its navigational information from a single source – Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS).
The golden rule that navigators should not rely on one source of information remains true.
This should cover the full voyage from berth to berth. When creating a plan we need to place waypoints and routes in such a way that we can independently verify that the GNSS position is accurate. This independent verification is essential for spotting when things aren’t right.
We can use Dilution of Precision numbers as an indication of likely precision and on more modern systems we may have a traffic light system. Whilst electronic methods indicate reduced precision, they don’t tell you what that means in terms of error in position. This is where pilotage routines using visual, compass, depth or radar techniques remain valid.
Building a route in your electronic chart systems (ECS) is essential to monitor progress against your plan. The most common ways to manage lack of screen space is to use rubber banding or auto-route. Rubber banding is the practice of starting with the first and last waypoints, then working forward from the start waypoint to place additional waypoints as needed. Auto-route is implemented differently in each brand of ECS, from using minimum depth required to all vessel dimensions.
The autoroute will usually be created by entering start and finish waypoints and the ECS suggests a route. We should never use an auto route without checking each waypoint, adjusting its position, or adding or deleting as necessary to ensure the route is correct. If you cannot adjust the waypoint on your system, stick with rubber banding.
The route in itself is not a plan, and you cannot create a route until you have identified all the limiting or significant factors. When creating the route, we can incorporate much of the additional information needed for a plan – each waypoint should mark an action or decision to be made.
Part of the plan in the digital system is to identify the settings that need to be used at various stages of the passage. We recommend setting COG vectors and heading vectors to a meaningful length. Other settings that may need to change are cross track distance, waypoint arrival distance, or depth alarms. Set alarms intelligently and identify a sensible value for triggering alarms.
By setting these parameters you’ll see where you’re meant to be (the route), where you are (the vessel position) and where you’re projected to be. This is the minimum to monitor progress and identify if action is needed.
Execution of the plan has not really changed in the digital world. Ensure that answers and assumptions used haven’t changed sufficiently to require a fresh look at the plan. With a carefully crafted set of waypoints, it is easy to monitor progress along the plan and monitor the reliability of position.
Take every opportunity to monitor your position by means other than the GNSS data. If you have a heading sensor, as recommended, it can be as easy as using the curser range and bearing feature to verify the bearing of a charted object or a rising/dipping light. Perhaps the easiest is using radar overlay. If the radar targets match charted objects, then the position is good.
Remember, electronic devices can take much of the drudgery and human error out of passage planning but the one who must ultimately make the decisions is the person acting as navigator.
To help prepare you for electronic navigation, learn more about the rise of enavigation and how to get more from your electronic navigation aids.
For further reading, the new edition of RYA Day Skipper Shorebased Notes is available to pre-order and covers the balance of paper-based and digital techniques for navigation.
RYA members can read more about passage planning in the digital age in the spring 2024 edition of RYA magazine.